
‘BNP spells danger for disabled people’
July 3, 2009The BNP’s success in European elections will be disastrous for disabled people, activists have warned.
BNP leader Nick Griffin was elected to represent the North West region while Andrew Brons won the seat for Yorkshire and Humber in the June 4 elections to the European Parliament.
Activist and campaigner Richard Rieser branded the BNP a fascist party and said that its electoral success was a result of large numbers of disillusioned Labour supporters failing to vote.
He said that disabled people in areas represented by the BNP would be afraid because fascists wanted to kill disabled people.
“The fascist record on dealing with disabled people is to kill us. They’re Holocaust deniers but I haven’t noticed them denying that disabled people were killed en masse in Germany.”
Julie Newman, Acting Chair of the UK’s Disabled People’s Council, said she could only think that a party denying the Holocaust would deny disabled people the right to exist too.
She said: “I think there’s a eugenics agenda because they want to get rid of anybody who taints the bloodline. I think that anybody who’s different from the BNP’s purist agenda is going to have a difficult time.”
Alice Maynard, Chair of disability charity Scope, said that black and ethnic-minority disabled people already endured considerable discrimination which she doubted would improve with the election of BNP politicians.
“One feels that the BNP’s approach to race is the negative bit, but I don’t think that disability is ever far behind. There are serious issues around the genetic agenda.”
All three campaigners said that they hoped the success of the BNP would serve as a rallying call to disabled people to ally with anti-fascist and anti-racist organisations.
In May, the Observer newspaper reported that Jeffrey Marshall, senior organiser for the BNP’s London European election campaign, had posted a message on an internet forum in which he commented on the death of David Cameron’s disabled son Ivan.
According to the Observer, Mr Marshall said: “We live in a country today which is unhealthily dominated by an excess of sentimentality towards the weak and unproductive. No good will come of it.”
The Observer article said that later, in response to comments made by others on the site, Marshall is alleged to have written: “There is not a great deal of point in keeping these people alive after all.”
The Observer added that Mr Marshall said the comments were private and some had been paraphrased and taken out of context. The paper said that he had admitted making the former comment but said he could not recall making the latter one.
Source: Disability Now
Julie Newman’s comment in DN prompted me to do some research. Though in one sense I wish I hadn’t because what I found is very upsetting. I feel I can’t say much, as the article speaks for itself.
It’s tough reading but please take a look a this article entitled ‘Euthanasia Program‘ from the United States Holocaust Museum.
Further Reading from USHM: Murder Of “The Unfit”
Harry Thomas
Not In My Name!
July 3, 2009Thanks to Sunny Hundal at Pickled Politics:
Hope Not Hate have sent out this email request:
In just two weeks the BNP will be taking their seats in the European Parliament. We need to send the strongest possible message that they are not there in our name. Over 80,000 people have already done just this by signing our Not in my Name petition – I want you to sign it next. All you need to do is click this link – you can add your name with just one click:
http://action.hopenothate.org.uk/notinmyname
I need your help in showing that Griffin and Brons don’t represent us – that they don’t speak for Britain. I’m currently organising who we’re going to hand our petition in to at the European Parliament on July 14th and I want to make sure we have as many names on it as possible. Please sign up now and then invite all of your friends to do the same:
Thank you.
I have already signed, and I hope that you will take the time to do the same.
Thanks
Cerebral Person
David Cameron Speaks Out
June 28, 2009Here’s a nice Twitterspat that has emerged between two Tory PPCs over David Cameron’s remarks on the BNP at Imperial College London yesterday.
Now I’m checking with CCHQ exactly what Cam did say, but novelist and wannabe MP Louise Bagshawe thinks he described the BNP as “retarded racists”. [UPDATE: It turns out Cameron did use the phrase in the Q&A not his speech]
She Tweeted:
David Cameron: the BNP “are retarded racists”. No fence sitting there!
However, another PPC Maria Hutchings – who famously confronted Tony Blair about the lack of facilities for her own son with special needs – didn’t see the funny side.
@LouiseBagshawe Sadly not a very positive message for learning disabled people.Particularly sad after Mark Harpers’ impassioned plea at PMQs
Bagshawe stood by her party leader, though, replying with this Tweet:
@MariaHutchings a beloved cousin has Down’s, so I see your point, but IMO “retarded” is accurately employed for BNP, not for the disabled
UPDATE: A spokeswoman for David Cameron says: “David has strongly held views on the BNP but he didn’t mean to cause any offence with these comments”.
Newsletter & Updates
June 24, 2009We have received a couple of requests for a newsletter… So why not?
As yet we have not even given any thought to frequency or what exactly is going to be in the newsletter. However if you would like to recieve something please send an email to:
Within 48 hours of receiving your email I will try and pop a message back to you to confirm your address is working and that you really do want to receive updates, so please expect a return email from the address above.
Simply reply to that message with Yes Please in the subject and its done, you will be on our mailing list!
If I don’t get a yes, you are not on the list.
Additional information for those interested.
Until we reach a significant number of subscribers our email/mailing list is a manual thing. If you have a impairment which means you would prefer plain text emails, just email the newsletter address above and I will sort it for you.
In the same way if you want to un-subscribe, just let me know and I will remove you from the list. Though if you are un-subscribing because the newsletter is terrible or something, please let me know and I will try to do better!
Important: Your personal details will never be shared with anyone, unless you give express permission.
Harry
The BNP Responds on Disability
June 23, 2009Recently, one of the bloggers at group blog Pickled Politics asked the BNP 85 questions. They have now answered 20 of them. One of these questions relates to disability:
19. How will a BNP government ensure the safety, protection and welfare of Britain’s current and future disabled population, considering that a senior member of the BNP has been on record as stating that he supports forced euthanasia of the handicapped and others deemed to be “a waste of time, money and resources”, including the very old and (especially) newborn babies, in response to the death of David Cameron’s baby in spring 2009?
Once again a single member said something stupid. What he said has nothing to do with BNP policy. The BNP have not passed the Abortion Laws that since 1967 have killed 6 million babies in Britain. Nor are the BNP the government that allows abortion for babies over 24 weeks if they are disabled. Many of the disabled in this country are lucky to have ever been born seeing as they can aborted at any time under the present abortion laws. They are lucky to be alive today due to Labour, Liberal and Tory policies which made a disability as grounds for a late abortion. The BNP respect all our people. Many of our top activists are also either disabled or have family members who suffer from disabilities.
Below is a story about comments made by individual Tory councillors talking rubbish, so does this mean the Tories are anti-disabled and will sterilise the White working class?
A sick Tory has suggested saving cash by killing off disabled children in care.
Senior councillor Hugh Jackson made the vile remark just days after David Cameron visited his area and claimed the party had changed.
Tory John Ward, who sits on Medway council, Kent, quit on Tuesday after calling for jobless mums, like Karen Matthews, to be sterilised.


BNP dismisses legal action threat
June 23, 2009The British National Party has dismissed threats of legal action over its membership policies by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.
The commission said it had written to the party over possible breaches of the law in the BNP’s constitution, membership rules and recruitment.
It asked the BNP to pledge to comply with the Race Relations Act by 20 July or face a potential legal injunction.
But BNP leader Nick Griffin said the party’s rules were “entirely legal”.
Mr Griffin – who was elected as an MEP for the North West on 4 June – said the BNP was an exempted organisation under Section 25 and Section 26 of the Race Relations Act.
He said this meant “ethnic groups who need special protection such as the English in their own country, who are now second class citizens” were “entitled to discriminate on that basis and not on the grounds of colour”.
He added: “We are not discriminating on grounds of colour.”
On 4 June, the BNP won their first two MEPs in the European Parliament elections.
‘Deliberate omission’
In a statement, the commission said the BNP’s constitution and membership criteria appeared to discriminate on the grounds of race and colour, in breach of the Race Relations Act.
The party’s rules appeared to restrict membership to those within what the BNP regarded as particular “ethnic groups”, the commission added.
It also said the party’s website asked job applicants to supply a membership number, which appeared to be in breach of legislation banning the “refusal or deliberate omission to offer employment on the basis of non-membership of an organisation”.
The statement added: “The commission is therefore concerned that the BNP may have acted, and be acting, illegally.”
John Wadham, the commission’s legal director, insisted it had a duty to take action against possible breaches of anti-discrimination laws.
He said: “The legal advice we have received indicates that the British National Party’s constitution and membership criteria, employment practices and provision of services to constituents and the public may breach discrimination laws which all political parties are legally obliged to uphold.”
The commission said it had received around 50 recent calls from members of the public about the membership policy of the BNP, although it is understood it was already investigating the party.
Teachers
The BNP’s Deputy press officer John Walker said the party would not be making a formal response to the commission at this stage as it wanted to “wait until the Equalities Bill has gone through”.
“We are not going to respond to threats like this. We will look at it, but it is an entirely politically-motivated attack,” he told BBC News.
The Equalities Bill, currently making its way through Parliament, is expected to include a move to outlaw the BNP’s membership policy, which is limited to various groups it defines as “indigenous Caucasian”.
Mr Walker said the BNP would be prepared to change its membership rules “to remain within the law”.
But he added: “I don’t think we should be bullied by outside forces. They are asking us to change our whole political ideology.”
On Monday, the Department for Children, Schools and Families said it was considering banning teachers in England from joining the BNP.
In its constitution, the BNP says it exists to represent the “collective National, Environmental, Political, Racial, Folkish, Social, Cultural, Religious and Economic interests of the indigenous Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Norse folk communities of Britain and those we regard as closely related and ethnically assimilated or assimilable aboriginal members of the European race also resident in Britain”.
It says membership of the BNP is “strictly defined within the terms of, and our members also self define themselves within, the legal ambit of a defined ‘racial group’ this being ‘Indigenous Caucasian’ and defined ‘ethnic groups’ emanating from that Race”.
Ed Balls Considers Ban on BNP Teachers
June 22, 2009Thanks to Liberal Conspiracy and The Guardian. This is good news, isn’t it? CP.
The government is investigating a possible ban on British National party members working as teachers in schools in a move that could challenge the legitimacy of the far-right party.
A source close to the schools secretary, Ed Balls, said there had been several meetings on the issue with teaching unions which are lobbying for a change in teachers’ contracts to prevent them from working if they are members of far-right groups including the BNP. The issue was being “actively looked at”, the source said.
It comes after it emerged that the General Teaching Council for England (GTC), which registers teachers to work in state schools, had rejected appeals to ban BNP members. Lawyers warned the council it could be accused of discriminating against members of the far-right party if it refused to register them.
Five members of the council’s own governing body wrote to the Guardian on Saturday to appeal for a national debate on the issue. They claimed the GTC was “hiding” behind legal advice to avoid banning the BNP from registering as teachers.
Chris Keates, the general secretary of the NASUWT teaching union, confirmed she had held several discussions with Balls about the possibility of a ban and had called for a change to teachers’ contracts to prevent BNP members from teaching.
The source close to Balls said the issue was being re-examined in the light of the election to the European parliament of two BNP members, including party leader Nick Griffin, who has been convicted of inciting racial hatred.
The GTC was advised by lawyers that it would be discriminatory to ban members of a lawful political party. It was also told that if it declared any views on the BNP, it could be accused of lacking impartiality in any subsequent disciplinary hearings involving teachers in the far-right party.
A BNP membership list leaked last year included the names of 15 teachers, four nurses and one prison officer as well as 17 former police officers and 16 members of the armed forces.
Members of the BNP, National Front and Combat 18 are banned from joining the police or becoming prison officers.
In the letter to the Guardian, the five GTC members argued that legislation required everyone working in schools to “promote good race relations and community cohesion”, which would be incompatible with some views held by the BNP. The party supports voluntary repatriation of non-white citizens.
Disabled people Stand Up!
June 20, 2009If you would like to publicly announce your support for DisAbled People Against The BNP please consider posting your name in the comments for this post.
We understand if you are nervous about this, particularly leaving your email address on the site. if that is the case please email me, Harry, at ht-writer@hotmail.com and I will add you to the comments anonymously and wont share your details with anyone.
And don’t forget if you have a web site or blog, please show our graphic on your site. If you use facebook, bebo, twitter etc … you can link to us through your page too!
See this post about the difference between the two graphics.
Harry Thomas
Posted by harrythomas 

